mysql的引擎常用的有两个,一个MyISAM,另一个是InnoDB,mysql默认的为MyISAM,而InnoDB才是支持事务的。所以一般需要修改下,如何修改就不说了。
事务需要依赖数据库,好久没使用声明式事务,今天试了下。关键配置如下。
<tx:advice id="transactionAdvice" transaction-manager="transactionManager"> <tx:attributes> <tx:method name="add*" propagation="REQUIRED" /> <tx:method name="append*" propagation="REQUIRED" /> <tx:method name="insert*" propagation="REQUIRED" /> <tx:method name="save*" propagation="REQUIRED" /> <tx:method name="update*" propagation="REQUIRED" /> <tx:method name="modify*" propagation="REQUIRED" /> <tx:method name="edit*" propagation="REQUIRED" /> <tx:method name="delete*" propagation="REQUIRED" /> <tx:method name="remove*" propagation="REQUIRED" /> <tx:method name="tx*" propagation="REQUIRED" /> <tx:method name="repair" propagation="REQUIRED" /> <tx:method name="delAndRepair" propagation="REQUIRED" /> <tx:method name="get*" propagation="SUPPORTS" /> <tx:method name="find*" propagation="SUPPORTS" /> <tx:method name="load*" propagation="SUPPORTS" /> <tx:method name="search*" propagation="SUPPORTS" /> <tx:method name="datagrid*" propagation="SUPPORTS" /> <tx:method name="*" propagation="SUPPORTS" /> </tx:attributes> </tx:advice> <aop:config> <aop:pointcut id="transactionPointcut" expression="execution(* com.wondersgroup.employeeBenefits.*.*.service..*Impl.*(..))" /> <!-- com.wondersgroup.benefit.*.core.service..*Impl.*(..) --> <aop:advisor pointcut-ref="transactionPointcut" advice-ref="transactionAdvice" /> </aop:config>
事务配置好之后再service中手动抛了个exception,结果没有回滚,service方法如下
@Override public int saveBudgetApplyInfo(BudgetApplyInfo budgetApplyInfo) throws Exception { budgetApplyInfoMapper.insert(budgetApplyInfo); if(1==1){ throw new Exception(); } return 1; }
跟着断点一步步进去查看原因
在
TransactionAspectSupport中发现这样一个方法
/** * Handle a throwable, completing the transaction. * We may commit or roll back, depending on the configuration. * @param txInfo information about the current transaction * @param ex throwable encountered */ protected void completeTransactionAfterThrowing(TransactionInfo txInfo, Throwable ex) { if (txInfo != null && txInfo.hasTransaction()) { if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) { logger.trace("Completing transaction for [" + txInfo.getJoinpointIdentification() + "] after exception: " + ex); } if (txInfo.transactionAttribute.rollbackOn(ex)) { try { txInfo.getTransactionManager().rollback(txInfo.getTransactionStatus()); } catch (TransactionSystemException ex2) { logger.error("Application exception overridden by rollback exception", ex); ex2.initApplicationException(ex); throw ex2; } catch (RuntimeException ex2) { logger.error("Application exception overridden by rollback exception", ex); throw ex2; } catch (Error err) { logger.error("Application exception overridden by rollback error", ex); throw err; } } else { // We don't roll back on this exception. // Will still roll back if TransactionStatus.isRollbackOnly() is true. try { txInfo.getTransactionManager().commit(txInfo.getTransactionStatus()); } catch (TransactionSystemException ex2) { logger.error("Application exception overridden by commit exception", ex); ex2.initApplicationException(ex); throw ex2; } catch (RuntimeException ex2) { logger.error("Application exception overridden by commit exception", ex); throw ex2; } catch (Error err) { logger.error("Application exception overridden by commit error", ex); throw err; } } } }
上面的方法中有这么一段
txInfo.transactionAttribute.rollbackOn(ex),这里是判断是否需要执行回滚操作的,跟踪rollbackOn方法最后会执行到
DefaultTransactionAttribute中的rollbackOn方法
/** * The default behavior is as with EJB: rollback on unchecked exception. * Additionally attempt to rollback on Error. * <p>This is consistent with TransactionTemplate's default behavior. */ public boolean rollbackOn(Throwable ex) { return (ex instanceof RuntimeException || ex instanceof Error); }
看到这里,应该都清楚了。。。自己主动抛异常Exception是不对的。这里只捕获运行时异常
RuntimeException 及Error,所以我们测试时不可以直接抛Exception,而应该换成
RuntimeException 。当然。也可在xml中指定rollback-for
<tx:method name="add*" propagation="REQUIRED" rollback-for="Exception" />
最后:个人还是比较喜欢基于注解的事务处理