每日一博 | 核心源码分析：Quartz 如何实现调度
前言
上一篇文章Quartz数据库表分析介绍了Quartz默认提供的11张表，本文将具体分析Quartz是如何调度的，是如何通过数据库的方式来现在分布式调度。
调度线程
Quartz内部提供的调度类是QuartzScheduler，而QuartzScheduler会委托QuartzSchedulerThread去实时调度；当调度完需要去执行job的时候QuartzSchedulerThread并没有直接去执行job，
而是交给ThreadPool去执行job，具体使用什么ThreadPool，初始化多线线程，可以在配置文件中进行配置：
org.quartz.threadPool.class: org.quartz.simpl.SimpleThreadPool org.quartz.threadPool.threadCount: 10 org.quartz.threadPool.threadPriority: 5
常用的线程池是SimpleThreadPool，这里默认启动了10个线程，在SimpleThreadPool会创建10个WorkerThread，由WorkerThread去执行具体的job；
调度分析
QuartzSchedulerThread是调度的核心类，具体Quartz是如何实现调度的，可以查看QuartzSchedulerThread核心源码：
public void run() {
boolean lastAcquireFailed = false;
while (!halted.get()) {
try {
// check if we're supposed to pause...
synchronized (sigLock) {
while (paused && !halted.get()) {
try {
// wait until togglePause(false) is called...
sigLock.wait(1000L);
} catch (InterruptedException ignore) {
}
}
if (halted.get()) {
break;
}
}
int availThreadCount = qsRsrcs.getThreadPool().blockForAvailableThreads();
if(availThreadCount > 0) { // will always be true, due to semantics of blockForAvailableThreads...
List<OperableTrigger> triggers = null;
long now = System.currentTimeMillis();
clearSignaledSchedulingChange();
try {
triggers = qsRsrcs.getJobStore().acquireNextTriggers(
now + idleWaitTime, Math.min(availThreadCount, qsRsrcs.getMaxBatchSize()), qsRsrcs.getBatchTimeWindow());
lastAcquireFailed = false;
if (log.isDebugEnabled())
log.debug("batch acquisition of " + (triggers == null ? 0 : triggers.size()) + " triggers");
} catch (JobPersistenceException jpe) {
if(!lastAcquireFailed) {
qs.notifySchedulerListenersError(
"An error occurred while scanning for the next triggers to fire.",
jpe);
}
lastAcquireFailed = true;
continue;
} catch (RuntimeException e) {
if(!lastAcquireFailed) {
getLog().error("quartzSchedulerThreadLoop: RuntimeException "
+e.getMessage(), e);
}
lastAcquireFailed = true;
continue;
}
if (triggers != null && !triggers.isEmpty()) {
now = System.currentTimeMillis();
long triggerTime = triggers.get(0).getNextFireTime().getTime();
long timeUntilTrigger = triggerTime - now;
while(timeUntilTrigger > 2) {
synchronized (sigLock) {
if (halted.get()) {
break;
}
if (!isCandidateNewTimeEarlierWithinReason(triggerTime, false)) {
try {
// we could have blocked a long while
// on 'synchronize', so we must recompute
now = System.currentTimeMillis();
timeUntilTrigger = triggerTime - now;
if(timeUntilTrigger >= 1)
sigLock.wait(timeUntilTrigger);
} catch (InterruptedException ignore) {
}
}
}
if(releaseIfScheduleChangedSignificantly(triggers, triggerTime)) {
break;
}
now = System.currentTimeMillis();
timeUntilTrigger = triggerTime - now;
}
// this happens if releaseIfScheduleChangedSignificantly decided to release triggers
if(triggers.isEmpty())
continue;
// set triggers to 'executing'
List<TriggerFiredResult> bndles = new ArrayList<TriggerFiredResult>();
boolean goAhead = true;
synchronized(sigLock) {
goAhead = !halted.get();
}
if(goAhead) {
try {
List<TriggerFiredResult> res = qsRsrcs.getJobStore().triggersFired(triggers);
if(res != null)
bndles = res;
} catch (SchedulerException se) {
qs.notifySchedulerListenersError(
"An error occurred while firing triggers '"
+ triggers + "'", se);
//QTZ-179 : a problem occurred interacting with the triggers from the db
//we release them and loop again
for (int i = 0; i < triggers.size(); i++) {
qsRsrcs.getJobStore().releaseAcquiredTrigger(triggers.get(i));
}
continue;
}
}
for (int i = 0; i < bndles.size(); i++) {
TriggerFiredResult result = bndles.get(i);
TriggerFiredBundle bndle = result.getTriggerFiredBundle();
Exception exception = result.getException();
if (exception instanceof RuntimeException) {
getLog().error("RuntimeException while firing trigger " + triggers.get(i), exception);
qsRsrcs.getJobStore().releaseAcquiredTrigger(triggers.get(i));
continue;
}
// it's possible to get 'null' if the triggers was paused,
// blocked, or other similar occurrences that prevent it being
// fired at this time... or if the scheduler was shutdown (halted)
if (bndle == null) {
qsRsrcs.getJobStore().releaseAcquiredTrigger(triggers.get(i));
continue;
}
JobRunShell shell = null;
try {
shell = qsRsrcs.getJobRunShellFactory().createJobRunShell(bndle);
shell.initialize(qs);
} catch (SchedulerException se) {
qsRsrcs.getJobStore().triggeredJobComplete(triggers.get(i), bndle.getJobDetail(), CompletedExecutionInstruction.SET_ALL_JOB_TRIGGERS_ERROR);
continue;
}
if (qsRsrcs.getThreadPool().runInThread(shell) == false) {
// this case should never happen, as it is indicative of the
// scheduler being shutdown or a bug in the thread pool or
// a thread pool being used concurrently - which the docs
// say not to do...
getLog().error("ThreadPool.runInThread() return false!");
qsRsrcs.getJobStore().triggeredJobComplete(triggers.get(i), bndle.getJobDetail(), CompletedExecutionInstruction.SET_ALL_JOB_TRIGGERS_ERROR);
}
}
continue; // while (!halted)
}
} else { // if(availThreadCount > 0)
// should never happen, if threadPool.blockForAvailableThreads() follows contract
continue; // while (!halted)
}
long now = System.currentTimeMillis();
long waitTime = now + getRandomizedIdleWaitTime();
long timeUntilContinue = waitTime - now;
synchronized(sigLock) {
try {
if(!halted.get()) {
// QTZ-336 A job might have been completed in the mean time and we might have
// missed the scheduled changed signal by not waiting for the notify() yet
// Check that before waiting for too long in case this very job needs to be
// scheduled very soon
if (!isScheduleChanged()) {
sigLock.wait(timeUntilContinue);
}
}
} catch (InterruptedException ignore) {
}
}
} catch(RuntimeException re) {
getLog().error("Runtime error occurred in main trigger firing loop.", re);
}
} // while (!halted)
// drop references to scheduler stuff to aid garbage collection...
qs = null;
qsRsrcs = null;
}
1.halted和paused
这是两个boolean值的标志参数，分别表示：停止和暂停；halted默认为false，当QuartzScheduler执行shutdown()时才会更新为true；paused默认是true，当QuartzScheduler执行start()时
更新为false；正常启动之后QuartzSchedulerThread就可以往下执行了；
2.availThreadCount
查询SimpleThreadPool是否有可用的WorkerThread，如果availThreadCount>0可以往下继续执行其他逻辑，否则继续检查；
3.acquireNextTriggers
查询一段时间内将要被调度的triggers，这里有3个比较重要的参数分别是：idleWaitTime，maxBatchSize，batchTimeWindow，这3个参数都可以在配置文件中进行配置：
org.quartz.scheduler.idleWaitTime:30000 org.quartz.scheduler.batchTriggerAcquisitionMaxCount:1 org.quartz.scheduler.batchTriggerAcquisitionFireAheadTimeWindow:0
idleWaitTime:在调度程序处于空闲状态时，调度程序将在重新查询可用触发器之前等待的时间量（以毫秒为单位），默认是30秒;
batchTriggerAcquisitionMaxCount:允许调度程序节点一次获取（用于触发）的触发器的最大数量，默认是1;
batchTriggerAcquisitionFireAheadTimeWindow:允许触发器在其预定的火灾时间之前被获取和触发的时间（毫秒）的时间量，默认是0;
往下继续查看acquireNextTriggers方法源码：
public List<OperableTrigger> acquireNextTriggers(final long noLaterThan, final int maxCount, final long timeWindow)
throws JobPersistenceException {
String lockName;
if(isAcquireTriggersWithinLock() || maxCount > 1) {
lockName = LOCK_TRIGGER_ACCESS;
} else {
lockName = null;
}
return executeInNonManagedTXLock(lockName,
new TransactionCallback<List<OperableTrigger>>() {
public List<OperableTrigger> execute(Connection conn) throws JobPersistenceException {
return acquireNextTrigger(conn, noLaterThan, maxCount, timeWindow);
}
},
......
});
}
可以发现只有在设置了acquireTriggersWithinLock或者batchTriggerAcquisitionMaxCount>1情况下才使用LOCK_TRIGGER_ACCESS锁，也就是说在默认参数配置的情况下，这里是没有使用锁的，
那么如果多个节点同时去执行acquireNextTriggers，会不会出现同一个trigger在多个节点都被执行？
注：acquireTriggersWithinLock可以在配置文件中进行配置：
org.quartz.jobStore.acquireTriggersWithinLock=true
acquireTriggersWithinLock：获取triggers的时候是否需要使用锁，默认是false，如果batchTriggerAcquisitionMaxCount>1最好同时设置acquireTriggersWithinLock为true；
带着问题继续查看TransactionCallback内部的acquireNextTrigger方法源码：
protected List<OperableTrigger> acquireNextTrigger(Connection conn, long noLaterThan, int maxCount, long timeWindow)
throws JobPersistenceException {
if (timeWindow < 0) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException();
}
List<OperableTrigger> acquiredTriggers = new ArrayList<OperableTrigger>();
Set<JobKey> acquiredJobKeysForNoConcurrentExec = new HashSet<JobKey>();
final int MAX_DO_LOOP_RETRY = 3;
int currentLoopCount = 0;
do {
currentLoopCount ++;
try {
List<TriggerKey> keys = getDelegate().selectTriggerToAcquire(conn, noLaterThan + timeWindow, getMisfireTime(), maxCount);
// No trigger is ready to fire yet.
if (keys == null || keys.size() == 0)
return acquiredTriggers;
long batchEnd = noLaterThan;
for(TriggerKey triggerKey: keys) {
// If our trigger is no longer available, try a new one.
OperableTrigger nextTrigger = retrieveTrigger(conn, triggerKey);
if(nextTrigger == null) {
continue; // next trigger
}
// If trigger's job is set as @DisallowConcurrentExecution, and it has already been added to result, then
// put it back into the timeTriggers set and continue to search for next trigger.
JobKey jobKey = nextTrigger.getJobKey();
JobDetail job;
try {
job = retrieveJob(conn, jobKey);
} catch (JobPersistenceException jpe) {
try {
getLog().error("Error retrieving job, setting trigger state to ERROR.", jpe);
getDelegate().updateTriggerState(conn, triggerKey, STATE_ERROR);
} catch (SQLException sqle) {
getLog().error("Unable to set trigger state to ERROR.", sqle);
}
continue;
}
if (job.isConcurrentExectionDisallowed()) {
if (acquiredJobKeysForNoConcurrentExec.contains(jobKey)) {
continue; // next trigger
} else {
acquiredJobKeysForNoConcurrentExec.add(jobKey);
}
}
if (nextTrigger.getNextFireTime().getTime() > batchEnd) {
break;
}
// We now have a acquired trigger, let's add to return list.
// If our trigger was no longer in the expected state, try a new one.
int rowsUpdated = getDelegate().updateTriggerStateFromOtherState(conn, triggerKey, STATE_ACQUIRED, STATE_WAITING);
if (rowsUpdated <= 0) {
continue; // next trigger
}
nextTrigger.setFireInstanceId(getFiredTriggerRecordId());
getDelegate().insertFiredTrigger(conn, nextTrigger, STATE_ACQUIRED, null);
if(acquiredTriggers.isEmpty()) {
batchEnd = Math.max(nextTrigger.getNextFireTime().getTime(), System.currentTimeMillis()) + timeWindow;
}
acquiredTriggers.add(nextTrigger);
}
// if we didn't end up with any trigger to fire from that first
// batch, try again for another batch. We allow with a max retry count.
if(acquiredTriggers.size() == 0 && currentLoopCount < MAX_DO_LOOP_RETRY) {
continue;
}
// We are done with the while loop.
break;
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new JobPersistenceException(
"Couldn't acquire next trigger: " + e.getMessage(), e);
}
} while (true);
// Return the acquired trigger list
return acquiredTriggers;
}
首先看一下在执行selectTriggerToAcquire方法时引入了新的参数：misfireTime=当前时间-MisfireThreshold，MisfireThreshold可以在配置文件中进行配置：
org.quartz.jobStore.misfireThreshold: 60000
misfireThreshold：叫触发器超时，比如有10个线程，但是有11个任务，这样就有一个任务被延迟执行了，可以理解为调度引擎可以忍受这个超时的时间；具体的查询SQL如下所示：
SELECT TRIGGER_NAME, TRIGGER_GROUP, NEXT_FIRE_TIME, PRIORITY
FROM qrtz_TRIGGERS
WHERE SCHED_NAME = 'myScheduler'
AND TRIGGER_STATE = 'WAITING'
AND NEXT_FIRE_TIME <= noLaterThan
AND (MISFIRE_INSTR = -1 OR
(MISFIRE_INSTR != -1 AND NEXT_FIRE_TIME >= noEarlierThan))
ORDER BY NEXT_FIRE_TIME ASC, PRIORITY DESC
这里的noLaterThan=当前时间+idleWaitTime+batchTriggerAcquisitionFireAheadTimeWindow，
noEarlierThan=当前时间-MisfireThreshold；
在查询完之后，会遍历执行updateTriggerStateFromOtherState()方法更新trigger的状态从STATE_WAITING到STATE_ACQUIRED，并且会判断rowsUpdated是否大于0，这样就算多个节点都查询到相同的trigger，但是肯定只会有一个节点更新成功；更新完状态之后，往qrtz_fired_triggers表中插入一条记录，表示当前trigger已经触发，状态为STATE_ACQUIRED；
4.executeInNonManagedTXLock
Quartz的分布式锁被用在很多地方，下面具体看一下Quartz是如何实现分布式锁的，executeInNonManagedTXLock方法源码如下：
protected <T> T executeInNonManagedTXLock(
String lockName,
TransactionCallback<T> txCallback, final TransactionValidator<T> txValidator) throws JobPersistenceException {
boolean transOwner = false;
Connection conn = null;
try {
if (lockName != null) {
// If we aren't using db locks, then delay getting DB connection
// until after acquiring the lock since it isn't needed.
if (getLockHandler().requiresConnection()) {
conn = getNonManagedTXConnection();
}
transOwner = getLockHandler().obtainLock(conn, lockName);
}
if (conn == null) {
conn = getNonManagedTXConnection();
}
final T result = txCallback.execute(conn);
try {
commitConnection(conn);
} catch (JobPersistenceException e) {
rollbackConnection(conn);
if (txValidator == null || !retryExecuteInNonManagedTXLock(lockName, new TransactionCallback<Boolean>() {
@Override
public Boolean execute(Connection conn) throws JobPersistenceException {
return txValidator.validate(conn, result);
}
})) {
throw e;
}
}
Long sigTime = clearAndGetSignalSchedulingChangeOnTxCompletion();
if(sigTime != null && sigTime >= 0) {
signalSchedulingChangeImmediately(sigTime);
}
return result;
} catch (JobPersistenceException e) {
rollbackConnection(conn);
throw e;
} catch (RuntimeException e) {
rollbackConnection(conn);
throw new JobPersistenceException("Unexpected runtime exception: "
+ e.getMessage(), e);
} finally {
try {
releaseLock(lockName, transOwner);
} finally {
cleanupConnection(conn);
}
}
}
大致分成3个步骤：获取锁，执行逻辑，释放锁；getLockHandler().obtainLock表示获取锁txCallback.execute(conn)表示执行逻辑，commitConnection(conn)表示释放锁
Quartz的分布式锁接口类是Semaphore，默认具体的实现是StdRowLockSemaphore，具体接口如下：
public interface Semaphore {
boolean obtainLock(Connection conn, String lockName) throws LockException;
void releaseLock(String lockName) throws LockException;
boolean requiresConnection();
}
具体看一下obtainLock()是如何获取锁的，源码如下：
public boolean obtainLock(Connection conn, String lockName)
throws LockException {
if (!isLockOwner(lockName)) {
executeSQL(conn, lockName, expandedSQL, expandedInsertSQL);
getThreadLocks().add(lockName);
} else if(log.isDebugEnabled()) {
}
return true;
}
protected void executeSQL(Connection conn, final String lockName, final String expandedSQL, final String expandedInsertSQL) throws LockException {
PreparedStatement ps = null;
ResultSet rs = null;
SQLException initCause = null;
int count = 0;
do {
count++;
try {
ps = conn.prepareStatement(expandedSQL);
ps.setString(1, lockName);
rs = ps.executeQuery();
if (!rs.next()) {
getLog().debug(
"Inserting new lock row for lock: '" + lockName + "' being obtained by thread: " +
Thread.currentThread().getName());
rs.close();
rs = null;
ps.close();
ps = null;
ps = conn.prepareStatement(expandedInsertSQL);
ps.setString(1, lockName);
int res = ps.executeUpdate();
if(res != 1) {
if(count < 3) {
try {
Thread.sleep(1000L);
} catch (InterruptedException ignore) {
Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
}
continue;
}
}
}
return; // obtained lock, go
} catch (SQLException sqle) {
......
} while(count < 4);
}
obtainLock首先判断是否已经获取到锁，如果没有执行方法executeSQL，其中有两条重要的SQL，分别是：expandedSQL和expandedInsertSQL，以SCHED_NAME = ‘myScheduler’为例：
SELECT * FROM QRTZ_LOCKS WHERE SCHED_NAME = 'myScheduler' AND LOCK_NAME = ? FOR UPDATE
INSERT INTO QRTZ_LOCKS(SCHED_NAME, LOCK_NAME) VALUES ('myScheduler', ?)
select语句后面添加了FOR UPDATE，如果LOCK_NAME存在，当多个节点去执行此SQL时，只有第一个节点会成功，其他的节点都将进入等待；
如果LOCK_NAME不存在，多个节点同时执行expandedInsertSQL，只会有一个节点插入成功，执行插入失败的节点将进入重试，重新执行expandedSQL；
txCallback执行完之后，执行commitConnection操作，这样当前节点就释放了LOCK_NAME，其他节点可以竞争获取锁，最后执行了releaseLock；
5.triggersFired
表示触发trigger，具体代码如下：
protected TriggerFiredBundle triggerFired(Connection conn,
OperableTrigger trigger)
throws JobPersistenceException {
JobDetail job;
Calendar cal = null;
// Make sure trigger wasn't deleted, paused, or completed...
try { // if trigger was deleted, state will be STATE_DELETED
String state = getDelegate().selectTriggerState(conn,
trigger.getKey());
if (!state.equals(STATE_ACQUIRED)) {
return null;
}
} catch (SQLException e) {
throw new JobPersistenceException("Couldn't select trigger state: "
+ e.getMessage(), e);
}
try {
job = retrieveJob(conn, trigger.getJobKey());
if (job == null) { return null; }
} catch (JobPersistenceException jpe) {
try {
getLog().error("Error retrieving job, setting trigger state to ERROR.", jpe);
getDelegate().updateTriggerState(conn, trigger.getKey(),
STATE_ERROR);
} catch (SQLException sqle) {
getLog().error("Unable to set trigger state to ERROR.", sqle);
}
throw jpe;
}
if (trigger.getCalendarName() != null) {
cal = retrieveCalendar(conn, trigger.getCalendarName());
if (cal == null) { return null; }
}
try {
getDelegate().updateFiredTrigger(conn, trigger, STATE_EXECUTING, job);
} catch (SQLException e) {
throw new JobPersistenceException("Couldn't insert fired trigger: "
+ e.getMessage(), e);
}
Date prevFireTime = trigger.getPreviousFireTime();
// call triggered - to update the trigger's next-fire-time state...
trigger.triggered(cal);
String state = STATE_WAITING;
boolean force = true;
if (job.isConcurrentExectionDisallowed()) {
state = STATE_BLOCKED;
force = false;
try {
getDelegate().updateTriggerStatesForJobFromOtherState(conn, job.getKey(),
STATE_BLOCKED, STATE_WAITING);
getDelegate().updateTriggerStatesForJobFromOtherState(conn, job.getKey(),
STATE_BLOCKED, STATE_ACQUIRED);
getDelegate().updateTriggerStatesForJobFromOtherState(conn, job.getKey(),
STATE_PAUSED_BLOCKED, STATE_PAUSED);
} catch (SQLException e) {
throw new JobPersistenceException(
"Couldn't update states of blocked triggers: "
+ e.getMessage(), e);
}
}
if (trigger.getNextFireTime() == null) {
state = STATE_COMPLETE;
force = true;
}
storeTrigger(conn, trigger, job, true, state, force, false);
job.getJobDataMap().clearDirtyFlag();
return new TriggerFiredBundle(job, trigger, cal, trigger.getKey().getGroup()
.equals(Scheduler.DEFAULT_RECOVERY_GROUP), new Date(), trigger
.getPreviousFireTime(), prevFireTime, trigger.getNextFireTime());
}
首先查询trigger的状态是否STATE_ACQUIRED状态，如果不是直接返回null；然后通过通过jobKey获取对应的jobDetail，更新对应的FiredTrigger为EXECUTING状态；最后判定job的DisallowConcurrentExecution是否开启，如果开启了不能并发执行job，那么trigger的状态为STATE_BLOCKED状态，否则为STATE_WAITING；如果状态为STATE_BLOCKED，那么下次调度
对应的trigger不会被拉取，只有等对应的job执行完之后，更新状态为STATE_WAITING之后才可以执行，保证了job的串行；
6.执行job
通过ThreadPool来执行封装job的JobRunShell；
问题解释
在文章 Spring整合Quartz分布式调度 中，最后做了几次测试分布式调度，现在可以做出相应的解释
1.同一trigger同一时间只会在一个节点执行
上文中可以发现Quartz使用了分布式锁和状态来保证只有一个节点能执行；
2.任务没有执行完，可以重新开始
因为调度线程和任务执行线程是分开的，认为执行在Threadpool中执行，互相不影响；
3.通过DisallowConcurrentExecution注解保证任务的串行
在triggerFired中如果使用了DisallowConcurrentExecution，会引入STATE_BLOCKED状态，保证任务的串行；
总结
本文从源码的角度大致介绍了一下Quartz调度的流程，当然太细节的东西没有去深入；通过本文大致可以对多节点调度产生的现象做一个合理的解释。
正文到此结束
- 本文标签： final JobDetail message bug 测试 数据库 IDE DOM Quartz 线程池 validator update tar 数据 遍历 锁 文章 Jobs 分布式 spring UI App 参数 ACE SchedulerListeners id synchronized https 配置 CTO REST http Listeners Collection equals struct map CEO list src JobDataMap IO ArrayList shell sql 时间 value Connection trigger Action 分布式锁 db cat 代码 key 总结 Job Persistence Thread pool 源码 线程 NSA Select
- 版权声明： 本文为互联网转载文章，出处已在文章中说明(部分除外)。如果侵权，请联系本站长删除，谢谢。
- 本文海报： 生成海报一 生成海报二
热门推荐
相关文章
近期评论
-
文章和留言都翻到11页了 没有OOM
-
-
朋友，翻页到11页，及以后，会出现OOM，无法访问
-
-
搞个gitee的项目
-
-
版本号是多少，你可以下载哪个代码仓库，jdk选1.8 直接跑就行
-
-
-
Loading...
![[HBLOG]公众号](https://www.liuhaihua.cn/img/qrcode_gzh.jpg)
