记得跟老婆谈恋爱时,有一天心血来潮给老婆做饭,按照菜谱一步一步的做,结果差点把厨房烧了!!!
这事至今老婆还记得。
上一篇说了,AbstractBeanFactory.getBean的主流程 ,今天来说下其中的createBean方法,程序入口如下:
/**. * 这个类的核心方法,创建一个bean实例, 填充bean实例,执行后处理等 * @see #doCreateBean 详见doCreateBean */ @Override protected Object createBean(String beanName, RootBeanDefinition mbd, @Nullable Object[] args) throws BeanCreationException { //..... } 复制代码
根据注释核心逻辑在doCreateBean 中,下面咱们就聊聊doCreateBean.
主流程 | 类比按菜谱做菜 |
---|---|
1. 实例化Bean BeanDefinition->BeanWrapper(如果是单例,先尝试从缓存中清楚并获取BeanWrapper) | 找到菜谱,先尝试从收藏中获取 |
2.处理MergedBeanDefinitionPostProcessors | 融合老婆的要求,到菜谱中。例如:少放盐 |
3.允许提前暴露ObjectFactory,解决循环引用问题(必须满足:单例&&允许循环引用&&对应的bean在创建) | 提前告诉老婆菜的大概味道,方便美丽的她准备饮料,也可以方便自己提前找出盘子 |
4.填充属性 | 炒菜 |
5.执行 init-method方法 | 试吃 |
6.有其他bean依赖当前完整bean(必须填充完属性),移除这些bean,有不能移除的抛出异常 | 发现之前准备的盘子太小了,换个新的。 |
7.注册DisposableBean接口或destroy—method | 做个好男人,吃完饭记得刷碗 |
BeanDerfinition已经上篇已经做过介绍(上一篇blog的传送门),下面说下BeanWrapper。 org.springframework.beans,BeanWrapper的注释翻译如下:
BeanWrapper是Spring中底层javaBean的核心接口 通常不直接使用,而是被BeanFactory和DataBinder使用 它提供对标准javabean的分析和操作的功能。 可以获取,设置属性值,获取属性值的descriptors,用于查询可读,可写的属性。 支持无限层嵌套属性。 BeanWrapper默认不支持对属性的旧值进行编辑,这样可以避免getter被调用时产生的副作用 设置 extractOldValueForEditor 为true,可以开启对旧属性值进行编辑。
知道了BeanWrapper就不难猜出BeanDefinition->BeanWrapper的大致逻辑了
BeanDefinition->BeanWrapper 就是将bean的元数据,转换为Bean,但是Bean没有对属性进行赋值。
-- 温安适 胡乱总结于20190921
createBeanInstance的源码:
protected BeanWrapper createBeanInstance(String beanName, RootBeanDefinition mbd, @Nullable Object[] args) { // 确认 bean的class,在这时已被解析了 Class<?> beanClass = resolveBeanClass(mbd, beanName); if (beanClass != null && !Modifier.isPublic(beanClass.getModifiers()) && !mbd.isNonPublicAccessAllowed()) { throw new BeanCreationException(mbd.getResourceDescription(), beanName, "Bean class isn't public, and non-public access not allowed: " + beanClass.getName()); } Supplier<?> instanceSupplier = mbd.getInstanceSupplier(); if (instanceSupplier != null) { return obtainFromSupplier(instanceSupplier, beanName); } if (mbd.getFactoryMethodName() != null) { return instantiateUsingFactoryMethod(beanName, mbd, args); } // 判断 是否重新创建同一bean时 boolean resolved = false; boolean autowireNecessary = false; if (args == null) { synchronized (mbd.constructorArgumentLock) { if (mbd.resolvedConstructorOrFactoryMethod != null) { resolved = true; autowireNecessary = mbd.constructorArgumentsResolved; } } } if (resolved) { if (autowireNecessary) { return autowireConstructor(beanName, mbd, null, null); } else { return instantiateBean(beanName, mbd); } } // 自动注入的构造器的,候选者 Constructor<?>[] ctors = determineConstructorsFromBeanPostProcessors(beanClass, beanName); if (ctors != null || mbd.getResolvedAutowireMode() == AUTOWIRE_CONSTRUCTOR || mbd.hasConstructorArgumentValues() || !ObjectUtils.isEmpty(args)) { return autowireConstructor(beanName, mbd, ctors, args); } // 获得首选的构造器,可能是默认构造器 ctors = mbd.getPreferredConstructors(); if (ctors != null) { return autowireConstructor(beanName, mbd, ctors, null); } // 没有特别处理简单实用,无参构造器 return instantiateBean(beanName, mbd); } 复制代码
我们可以看到,这个createBeanInstance ,有3种处理方式
一般按照反射生成实例的方式如下方式:
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception{ Class<CouponApplicationTests> clazz=CouponApplicationTests.class; clazz.newInstance(); Constructor constructorToUse = clazz.getDeclaredConstructor(); constructorToUse.newInstance() } 复制代码
Spring是如何实现的基本类似。查阅 instantiateBean的源码发现,其核心逻辑委托给InstantiationStrategy的instantiate方法 。Spring5.X的默认InstantiationStrategy 是CglibSubclassingInstantiationStrategy,而instantiate的实现并不在CglibSubclassingInstantiationStrategy中而是在,其父类SimpleInstantiationStrategy中。如下:
@Override public Object instantiate(RootBeanDefinition bd, @Nullable String beanName, BeanFactory owner) { // Don't override the class with CGLIB if no overrides. // 如果没有override方法, 即没有使用CGLIB重写 if (!bd.hasMethodOverrides()) { Constructor<?> constructorToUse; synchronized (bd.constructorArgumentLock) { constructorToUse = (Constructor<?>) bd.resolvedConstructorOrFactoryMethod; if (constructorToUse == null) { final Class<?> clazz = bd.getBeanClass(); if (clazz.isInterface()) { throw new BeanInstantiationException(clazz, "Specified class is an interface"); } try { if (System.getSecurityManager() != null) { constructorToUse = AccessController.doPrivileged( (PrivilegedExceptionAction<Constructor<?>>) clazz::getDeclaredConstructor); } else { constructorToUse = clazz.getDeclaredConstructor(); } bd.resolvedConstructorOrFactoryMethod = constructorToUse; } catch (Throwable ex) { throw new BeanInstantiationException(clazz, "No default constructor found", ex); } } } //就是执行constructorToUse.newInstance() return BeanUtils.instantiateClass(constructorToUse); } else { // Must generate CGLIB subclass. return instantiateWithMethodInjection(bd, beanName, owner); } } 复制代码
如果没有MethodOverride,其大致逻辑,跟咱们写的差不多。 但是如果有MethodOverride则不同。
看到这里的时候我很好奇hasMethodOverrides和instantiateWithMethodInjection,看名称我猜测是对@Override注解进行处理,但是看了源码这个 MethodOverrides是指replace-method和lookup-method ,这个2配置,我没有使用过,查询了源码与网上的blog。简单说就是在这里利用Cglib实现方法注入。 对lookup-method和replace-method的说明您可以查阅
什么是循环引用,举个列子:BeanA引用BeanB,BeanB也引用BeanA
@Component class BeanA{ @Autowired BeanB beanB; } @Component class BeanB{ @Autowired BeanA beanA; } 复制代码
Spring只能解决单例类型的循环,其解决帮扶就是提前暴露ObjectFactory,将未填充完属性的bean提前暴露出来。 流程图如下:
写blog比看源码要费劲的多,我总是尝试使用生活中的例子比喻主流程,再加一点的补充说明。 以做菜比喻Spring源码,感觉自己源码学虽然不透彻,但是胃口好多了。
做菜喻源码
轮廓渐清晰
理解未透彻
肚子叫呱呱
美餐一顿去
下回咱再聊
/** * Actually create the specified bean. Pre-creation processing has already happened * at this point, e.g. checking {@code postProcessBeforeInstantiation} callbacks. * <p>Differentiates between default bean instantiation, use of a * factory method, and autowiring a constructor. * 创建指定的Bean,此时创建前预处理已经执行了(查看postProcessBeforeInstantiation)。 * 区分默认bean实例化,工厂方法,并自动注入构造函数。 * @param beanName the name of the bean * @param mbd the merged bean definition for the bean * @param args explicit arguments to use for constructor or factory method invocation * @return a new instance of the bean * @throws BeanCreationException if the bean could not be created * @see #instantiateBean * @see #instantiateUsingFactoryMethod * @see #autowireConstructor */ protected Object doCreateBean(final String beanName, final RootBeanDefinition mbd, final @Nullable Object[] args) throws BeanCreationException { // Instantiate the bean. // 1.实例化bean BeanWrapper instanceWrapper = null; if (mbd.isSingleton()) { //Cache of unfinished FactoryBean instances 从FactoryBean name to BeanWrapper. //移除未完成的bean的缓存中的实例 instanceWrapper = this.factoryBeanInstanceCache.remove(beanName); } if (instanceWrapper == null) { //创建Bean实例 将BeanDefinition替换成BeanWrapper instanceWrapper = createBeanInstance(beanName, mbd, args); } final Object bean = instanceWrapper.getWrappedInstance(); Class<?> beanType = instanceWrapper.getWrappedClass(); if (beanType != NullBean.class) { mbd.resolvedTargetType = beanType; } // Allow post-processors to modify the merged bean definition. synchronized (mbd.postProcessingLock) { //Bean if (!mbd.postProcessed) { try { //@AutoWired注解在这里,应用 //2.处理MergedBeanDefinitionPostProcessors applyMergedBeanDefinitionPostProcessors(mbd, beanType, beanName); } catch (Throwable ex) { throw new BeanCreationException(mbd.getResourceDescription(), beanName, "Post-processing of merged bean definition failed", ex); } mbd.postProcessed = true; } } // Eagerly cache singletons to be able to resolve circular references // even when triggered by lifecycle interfaces like BeanFactoryAware. // 3.允许提前暴露ObjectFactory,解决循环引用问题 // 单例,允许循环引用,对应的bean在创建 boolean earlySingletonExposure = (mbd.isSingleton() && this.allowCircularReferences && isSingletonCurrentlyInCreation(beanName)); if (earlySingletonExposure) { if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) { logger.trace("Eagerly caching bean '" + beanName + "' to allow for resolving potential circular references"); } addSingletonFactory(beanName, () -> getEarlyBeanReference(beanName, mbd, bean)); } // Initialize the bean instance. // 实例化bean Object exposedObject = bean; try { //4.填充属性 populateBean(beanName, mbd, instanceWrapper); //5.执行 init-method方法 exposedObject = initializeBean(beanName, exposedObject, mbd); } catch (Throwable ex) { if (ex instanceof BeanCreationException && beanName.equals(((BeanCreationException) ex).getBeanName())) { throw (BeanCreationException) ex; } else { throw new BeanCreationException( mbd.getResourceDescription(), beanName, "Initialization of bean failed", ex); } } //6.有其他bean依赖当前完整bean(填充过属性),移除这些bean,有不能移除的抛出异常 if (earlySingletonExposure) { Object earlySingletonReference = getSingleton(beanName, false); if (earlySingletonReference != null) { if (exposedObject == bean) { exposedObject = earlySingletonReference; } else if (!this.allowRawInjectionDespiteWrapping && hasDependentBean(beanName)) { //不允许注入未被完全装载的bean,并且有其他Bean依赖当前这个Bean String[] dependentBeans = getDependentBeans(beanName); Set<String> actualDependentBeans = new LinkedHashSet<>(dependentBeans.length); for (String dependentBean : dependentBeans) { //移除依赖于当前Bean的其他bean if (!removeSingletonIfCreatedForTypeCheckOnly(dependentBean)) { actualDependentBeans.add(dependentBean); } } if (!actualDependentBeans.isEmpty()) { //还有其他bean,依赖于当前Bean,未被移除 throw new BeanCurrentlyInCreationException(beanName, "Bean with name '" + beanName + "' has been injected into other beans [" + StringUtils.collectionToCommaDelimitedString(actualDependentBeans) + "] in its raw version as part of a circular reference, but has eventually been " + "wrapped. This means that said other beans do not use the final version of the " + "bean. This is often the result of over-eager type matching - consider using " + "'getBeanNamesOfType' with the 'allowEagerInit' flag turned off, for example."); } } } } // Register bean as disposable. try { //7.如果实现了 DisposableBean接口或者提供了destroy—method 在这里注册 registerDisposableBeanIfNecessary(beanName, bean, mbd); } catch (BeanDefinitionValidationException ex) { throw new BeanCreationException( mbd.getResourceDescription(), beanName, "Invalid destruction signature", ex); } return exposedObject; } 复制代码